From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5408 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 18:19:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5401 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 18:19:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 18:19:37 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GIGOW01859; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:16:25 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:53:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Zack Weinberg , Nathanael Nerode cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: "Have we branched yet?" Message-ID: <319430000.1034792184@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20021016041339.GV15067@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00981.txt.bz2 --On Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:13:39 PM -0700 Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:04:14AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> Have we branched yet? > > It's Mark's call, but I don't think the tree is in shape to be > branched. Wanna fix some bugs? Exactly right. My first priority is GCC 3.2.1, which needs high-priority bugs to go away first. Branching GCC 3.3 is a secondary priority, and that needs high-priority bugs to go away too. There's been some bug-fixing activity, but we need lots more! -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com