From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E3CC3858D28 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:43:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7E3CC3858D28 Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id t18so37926715wrg.11 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:43:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WLRH1GOA/UbYQI9cblu2kKeiQS5MWGhIXj+k2RdAGYo=; b=Vk8d+5Hp/van0oPLnzkWycTRirmSt3yydv3LuhTwImUD9kwOGzfm71kDqyL7f9dww+ aZsWyJeQSJYfHyLWG7FSUgia6MkAkMSPkVx0kY5FwzHqH3QNDZq3qc/c6u1N1PHq50UU Y+CcYVjlBGtqKYsu7o5WK6PoiugkXeDkEUcuukvgpmsIMYzvRftwdaj3GlKOGuS9Z/7O XtHIfAxsLpedbrTiq4KV9B4gx2yAQHpaYqQltEeb3tHj/1nbLkX4QVqXB+dgZdMsRcMD XrqyGIlrTvJRBGpaPxFa5lMVdKE6UZIGMpLerHQPlZtAL5xzPzG7ci7Z9e/IiTPp8w6m PJfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sCAFfTcnlbTgxQmej2nNiMNnBDlNL9mHB29WYdTi970SyfHzY d7BildBORI5/JQD0wZijoPM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwzHO5ZQZoOykMe7v6mIqBbQ46TmzSf2ZVbWM+heq+UaLCgOMHng0n9Hlr4qbmUt/Iv57z1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1848:: with SMTP id c8mr4147993wri.265.1639572192531; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:43:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.214] (host81-138-1-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.138.1.83]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g16sm2046041wmq.20.2021.12.15.04.43.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:43:11 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Subject: Re: Labelling of regressions in Bugzilla From: Iain Sandoe In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:43:09 +0000 Cc: Tobias Burnus , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <31E3E11B-F959-4E9C-BB5E-460BAE3525BB@googlemail.com> References: <2f461e1e-f325-9dd6-f0e4-6ea0f9b734a8@mentor.com> To: Jonathan Wakely X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:43:15 -0000 > On 15 Dec 2021, at 12:29, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 12:22, Tobias Burnus wrote: >>=20 >> On 15.12.21 12:39, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: >>=20 >>> Iain pointed out a drawback of not having the regression info in the >>> Summary. Currently it does draw your attention when looking at the >>> results of a bugzilla search. Andrew noted that bug aliases are >>> automatically added to the summary, e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR94404 >>> shows its alias "(c++core-issues)". >> Wouldn't it be easier to click on the "[Change Columns]" button at = the >> bottom of the search result page and add the new field to the = "Selected >> Columns"? The known-to-(work/fail) columns are available, i.e. this >> feature also works with custom fields. >=20 > Yes, I'd be fine with that solution (thanks, for the reminder, I > should have mentioned that option in my initial mail). >=20 > If you reorder the "known to fail" column so it comes right before the > Summary column you would get a clear list of regressions shown before > the rest of the summary (and nothing in that column for > non-regressions). >=20 > A possible downside is that would show all the branches the regression > was on, including closed ones. Again, I'd be fine with that, but it's > a change from the info visible at a glance in the Summary today. I just tried this with my local search and it line-wraps the list so = that it does not matter too much about the number of branches reported. However "known to fail=E2=80=9D is not currently =E2=80=9Cregressed = for=E2=80=9D they have distinct meanings (both of which are useful IMO). Iain