From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25859 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 18:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25823 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 18:54:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 18:54:27 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GIqEW01925; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:52:14 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:24:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Nathan Sidwell cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "aoliva@redhat.com" , "jason@redhat.com" Subject: Re: PR 8134: C++ crash Message-ID: <334420000.1034794334@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <3DADB463.2060807@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00988.txt.bz2 --On Wednesday, October 16, 2002 07:48:03 PM +0100 Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Mark Mitchell wrote: > [option (c)] > > Another data point. We didn't move over Jason's and my virtual base > patches from the mainline to the 3.0.x branch, for fear of > incompatibility. *Even though we knew they fixed KDE builds.* > > I think those patches are comparable with your patch. I agree. Thanks for reminding me of the precedent. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com