public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Glendenning <bglenden@aoc.nrao.edu>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@wrs.com>
Cc: amylaar@cygnus.co.uk, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: egcs 1.0.2 c++ .o size
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 13:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3522B3C0.16041341@aoc.nrao.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199803302119.NAA07654@kankakee.wrs.com>

> Use -fsjlj-exceptions, and compare against your application without

This didn't help (I didn't turn off our emulation, but it is very
cheap).

Here are the figures for an individual .o (all -O2)

gcc 2.7.2                         29k
egcs 1.0.2                        47k
egcs -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti    26k
egcs -fsjlj-exceptions            41k

These size ratio basically follow all the way through to the final
executables. The result of objdump -h is:

Table.egcs.o:     file format elf32-sparc

Sections:
Idx Name          Size      VMA       LMA       File off  Algn
  0 .text         0000316c  00000000  00000000  000000f4  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
  1 .rodata       0000026f  00000000  00000000  00003260  2**3
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, DATA
  2 .data         00000004  00000000  00000000  000034d0  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
  3 .dtors        00000004  00000000  00000000  000034d4  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, DATA
  4 .ctors        00000004  00000000  00000000  000034d8  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, DATA
  5 .gcc_except_table 000005a0  00000000  00000000  000034dc  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, DATA
  6 .eh_frame     00000a5c  00000000  00000000  00003a7c  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, DATA
  7 .bss          00000001  00000000  00000000  000044d8  2**0
                  ALLOC
  8 .comment      00000050  00000000  00000000  0000b500  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY

Is this typical, or are we somehow doing something that tickles
particularly bad space behaviour of the exception handling code?

Brian


  reply	other threads:[~1998-04-01 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-03-30 16:18 Mike Stump
1998-04-01 13:41 ` Brian Glendenning [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-03-26 18:14 Mike Stump
1998-03-24 16:25 Brian Glendenning
1998-03-27 15:18 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-03-27 15:18 ` Joern Rennecke
1998-03-27 15:18   ` Brian Glendenning
1998-03-31  0:46     ` Jim Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3522B3C0.16041341@aoc.nrao.edu \
    --to=bglenden@aoc.nrao.edu \
    --cc=amylaar@cygnus.co.uk \
    --cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
    --cc=mrs@wrs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).