From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Iain McClatchie <iainmcc@ix.netcom.com>
To: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: egcs-1.0.2: results on i686-pc-linux-gnulibc1
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 23:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <353D239C.137D1C6F@ix.netcom.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-04/msg00883.html

I got much the same results as Jon Bernard.  In the summary below,
I've reordered my output to match his.  It appears you folks
recategorized a few of the g++ tests.

XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C  Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C  Execution test

                === g++ Summary ===     === what Jon got ===

# of expected passes            3400          3393
# of unexpected successes       3             7
# of expected failures          80            82
# of untested testcases         6             6

                === gcc Summary ===     === what Jon got ===

# of expected passes            4883          4883
# of expected failures          5             5
# of unsupported tests          7             7

                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            30            30

                === g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes            130           130
# of unexpected failures        2             2

-Iain McClatchie