* 1.0.3 pre-release available @ 1998-04-26 0:01 Jeffrey A Law 1998-04-26 8:21 ` Toon Moene ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-04-26 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: egcs I've made the egcs-1.0.3 prerelease available. ~ftp/pub/egcs/snapshots/egcs-1.0.3-prerelease There's a full tarball and a set of diffs from 1.0.2 to the 1.0.3 prerelease. Assuming no packaging errors are found while I'm on vacation next week I'll tweak the version string and make the offical egcs-1.0.3 release ready when I return. For reference, here's what's changed: * Fix typo in libio (HJ -- can you be more specific about what exactly you fixed?) * Fix the Fortran negative array index problem (again). * Fix a few Alpha code generation and compiler abort problems exposed by RedHat 5.1. * Fix 2 x86 code generation bugs exposed by glibc2 and RedHat 5.1. * Fix rs6000/ppc bug when converting from values from integer types to floating point types in frameless functions. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-26 0:01 1.0.3 pre-release available Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-04-26 8:21 ` Toon Moene 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law 1998-04-26 12:45 ` H.J. Lu [not found] ` <m0yTUQG-000598C.cygnus.egcs@ocean.lucon.org> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Toon Moene @ 1998-04-26 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law; +Cc: egcs > I've made the egcs-1.0.3 prerelease available. > * Fix typo in libio (HJ -- can you be more specific about > what exactly you fixed?) > * Fix the Fortran negative array index problem (again). This indeed seems to be fixed (see below). > * Fix a few Alpha code generation and compiler abort problems > exposed by RedHat 5.1. So there were Linux/Alpha problems ? Shees, means that Joe was right after all - perhaps I missed it due to the ix86 advocates being so much more vocal (gives a whole new meaning to "devils advocate" :-) > * Fix 2 x86 code generation bugs exposed by glibc2 and > RedHat 5.1. > * Fix rs6000/ppc bug when converting from values from integer > types to floating point types in frameless functions. This is what I got on a "Red Hat Linux release 4.2 (Biltmore)" Alpha system (alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnulibc1 according to configure). Build & compare without problems. Result of make -k check: === libio tests === === libio Summary === # of expected passes 40 === libstdc++ tests === FAIL: tstring.cc compilation FAIL: tstring.cc -O compilation === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes 24 # of unexpected failures 2 # of expected failures 4 === gcc tests === FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 4856 # of unexpected failures 14 # of expected failures 5 # of unsupported tests 9 === g++ tests === FAIL: g++.benjamin/p12475.C (test for warnings, line 4) XPASS: g++.brendan/array1.C overflow in array dimension.* , (test for errors, line 6) XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38) XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes 3388 # of unexpected failures 3 # of unexpected successes 4 # of expected failures 82 # of untested testcases 10 === g77 tests === FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O0 FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O1 === g77 Summary === # of expected passes 130 # of unexpected failures 2 Furthermore, I tried the following Fortran example, which fails with egcs-1.0.2: program rotor implicit none integer KaKc(0:5,-5:5,0:2) integer cj call setkac( KaKc, 5 ) stop end c --------------------------------------------- subroutine setkac( KaKc, Jmax ) implicit none integer Jmax integer KaKc( 0:Jmax, -Jmax:Jmax, 0:2 ) integer cj, i cj = 0 i = -cj KaKc( cj, i, 1 ) = 0 write(*,*) 'Here we go !' KaKc( cj, -cj, 1 ) = 0 return end which would bomb after the message "Here we go !", and now completes succesfully. Cheers, Toon. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-26 8:21 ` Toon Moene @ 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law 1998-04-26 18:03 ` Michael Alan Dorman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toon Moene; +Cc: egcs In message < 9804261449.AA17362@moene.indiv.nluug.nl >you write: > So there were Linux/Alpha problems ? Shees, means that Joe was > right after all - perhaps I missed it due to the ix86 advocates > being so much more vocal (gives a whole new meaning to "devils > advocate" :-) There was a profiling problem and problems compiling ImageMagick and emacs-20.2. I've expanded on the "Alpha bugs" section in the propsed release announcement :-) > === libstdc++ tests === > > FAIL: tstring.cc compilation > FAIL: tstring.cc -O compilation Hmmm, this worries me a little. Then again, maybe this has been failing all along. > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O0 The "glob" problem with the Linux C library. > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O0 The usual complex failures. > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O0 Not sure. This might be another case where the alpha needs -mieee. Dunno. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-04-26 18:03 ` Michael Alan Dorman 1998-04-27 0:33 ` Richard Henderson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Michael Alan Dorman @ 1998-04-26 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: egcs Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes: > There was a profiling problem and problems compiling ImageMagick > and emacs-20.2. I've expanded on the "Alpha bugs" section in the > propsed release announcement :-) Ah, I just ran into the emacs issue yesterday. It's great that it's fixed. Our normal gcc-compiling-person will hopefully have the pre-release pacakged soon. > > FAIL: tstring.cc compilation > > FAIL: tstring.cc -O compilation > Hmmm, this worries me a little. Then again, maybe this has been > failing all along. Is there anyone that you know of consistently running the test suite against the compiler on Linux/Alpha? If not, I'd certainly volunteer to do this, if it's useful. I guess I kind of figured that with RTH here, it was probably covered. Mike. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-26 18:03 ` Michael Alan Dorman @ 1998-04-27 0:33 ` Richard Henderson 1998-04-27 8:47 ` H.J. Lu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Richard Henderson @ 1998-04-27 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Alan Dorman; +Cc: egcs On Sun, Apr 26, 1998 at 09:03:34PM -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > Ah, I just ran into the emacs issue yesterday. It's great that it's > fixed. Our normal gcc-compiling-person will hopefully have the > pre-release pacakged soon. Do make sure emacs is fixed for you. Cristian Gafton had reported a problem, but not given details. Later he reported that he could not reproduce it. It could have been the same problem as afflicted ImageMagik, which would explain things, but it would be good to have this verified. > Is there anyone that you know of consistently running the test suite > against the compiler on Linux/Alpha? Alexandre Oliva runs the tests regularly on a whole suite of systems, including alpha-unknown-linux-gnu. I run them myself often, though I don't always do anything about failures immediately. ;-) I don't recall what the tstring.cc failure is. I'm much worse about following up on c++ failures vs c/f77 failures. The only two I recall that I expect to fail are complex-5 and fp-cmp-1. r~ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-27 0:33 ` Richard Henderson @ 1998-04-27 8:47 ` H.J. Lu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: H.J. Lu @ 1998-04-27 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rth; +Cc: mdorman, egcs > > I don't recall what the tstring.cc failure is. I'm much worse about > following up on c++ failures vs c/f77 failures. > I think that may be caused by the new binutils and old glibc. At least, that was what I saw on alpha. Please make sure you follow my release note if you use binutils newer than 2.8.1. I don't think the official binutils mentions it at all. -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-26 0:01 1.0.3 pre-release available Jeffrey A Law 1998-04-26 8:21 ` Toon Moene @ 1998-04-26 12:45 ` H.J. Lu 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law [not found] ` <m0yTUQG-000598C.cygnus.egcs@ocean.lucon.org> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: H.J. Lu @ 1998-04-26 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law; +Cc: egcs > > For reference, here's what's changed: > > * Fix typo in libio (HJ -- can you be more specific about > what exactly you fixed?) > Ok. I will give it one more try. Please let me know what else I can do to explain it clearer. H.J. -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available 1998-04-26 12:45 ` H.J. Lu @ 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: egcs In message < m0yTUQG-000598C@ocean.lucon.org >you write: > Ok. I will give it one more try. Please let me know what else I > can do to explain it clearer. Sorry, I didn't mean to imply you hadn't provided this information already -- I knew you had, but I couldn't easily find it in my saved messages. Thanks for the URLs, they have the information I need. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <m0yTUQG-000598C.cygnus.egcs@ocean.lucon.org>]
* Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available [not found] ` <m0yTUQG-000598C.cygnus.egcs@ocean.lucon.org> @ 1998-04-26 21:56 ` Nathan Myers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Nathan Myers @ 1998-04-26 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: egcs H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > > For reference, here's what's changed: > > > > * Fix typo in libio (HJ -- can you be more specific about > > what exactly you fixed?) > > > > Ok. I will give it one more try. Please let me know what else I > can do to explain it clearer. For what it's worth, this patch has also been applied to the unsupported/isolib source. Nathan Myers ncm@cantrip.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-04-27 8:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 1998-04-26 0:01 1.0.3 pre-release available Jeffrey A Law 1998-04-26 8:21 ` Toon Moene 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law 1998-04-26 18:03 ` Michael Alan Dorman 1998-04-27 0:33 ` Richard Henderson 1998-04-27 8:47 ` H.J. Lu 1998-04-26 12:45 ` H.J. Lu 1998-04-26 10:05 ` Jeffrey A Law [not found] ` <m0yTUQG-000598C.cygnus.egcs@ocean.lucon.org> 1998-04-26 21:56 ` Nathan Myers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).