From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report)
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35850000.995650535@warlock.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0107190925220.7949-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
> Well, here I have to step up again, I'm afraid. If you look at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-07/msg01376.html
> you'll see that C++ projects heavily relying on STL apparently
> simply cannot use GCC 3.0.
An extreme statement, but, that aside, as you know people are working
on fixes. The point is that 3.0.1 is better than 3.0; that is good.
Ideally, it would be better, but the point is to make consistent
progress.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-20 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-18 18:41 GCC 3.0.1 Status Report Mark Mitchell
2001-07-19 6:17 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-07-20 3:45 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-07-20 10:26 ` C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report) Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-20 10:54 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-07-20 16:41 ` Loren James Rittle
2001-07-23 5:17 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-23 11:56 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-23 2:51 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-20 10:55 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2001-07-20 14:22 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-20 16:28 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-07-20 21:05 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-23 10:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-23 11:12 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-23 11:57 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-23 13:30 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-24 7:18 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-24 7:55 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-24 10:09 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-24 10:19 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-24 10:44 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-24 10:56 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-24 10:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-24 10:49 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-24 11:08 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-23 14:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-07-25 8:06 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-08-02 0:20 ` C++ compile-time regressions Gerald Pfeifer
2001-08-02 0:26 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-08-02 11:00 ` aoliva
2001-08-02 12:00 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-08-02 12:26 ` aoliva
2001-08-02 12:37 ` Joe Buck
2001-08-02 12:41 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-08-02 12:48 ` Joe Buck
2001-08-02 13:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-08-07 7:54 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-07-23 11:54 ` C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report) Daniel Berlin
2001-07-23 12:42 ` Bernd Schmidt
2001-07-23 12:50 ` law
2001-07-23 13:15 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-23 14:00 ` law
2001-07-20 10:57 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-20 14:20 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-25 17:52 ` GCC 3.0.1 Status Report Marc Espie
2001-08-13 23:15 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35850000.995650535@warlock.codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).