From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Mitchell To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:55:00 -0000 Message-id: <35850000.995650535@warlock.codesourcery.com> References: X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg01424.html > Well, here I have to step up again, I'm afraid. If you look at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-07/msg01376.html > you'll see that C++ projects heavily relying on STL apparently > simply cannot use GCC 3.0. An extreme statement, but, that aside, as you know people are working on fixes. The point is that 3.0.1 is better than 3.0; that is good. Ideally, it would be better, but the point is to make consistent progress. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com