From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us2-ob3-1.mailhostbox.com (us2-ob3-1.mailhostbox.com [208.91.199.217]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9560385E83A for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:19:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D9560385E83A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=soulstudios.co.nz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=matt@soulstudios.co.nz Received: from [192.168.43.245] (unknown [118.148.85.193]) (Authenticated sender: matt@soulstudios.co.nz) by us2.outbound.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 98426D7011; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:18:58 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: removing toxic emailers To: Adrian , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: From: Soul Studios Message-ID: <35d55f54-c7b7-d0c1-e99e-8a56de1327f3@soulstudios.co.nz> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:18:55 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=BsPjPrf5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=JEiKyCuxLO9vqrtLFZXdmw==:117 a=JEiKyCuxLO9vqrtLFZXdmw==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=9UbbwrskUQar2bp1pZUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1161.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:19:04 -0000 On 15/04/2021 11:09 am, Adrian via Gcc wrote: > Eric S. Raymond : > Speaking as a "high functioning autist", I'm aware of the difficulties that > some of us have with social interactions - and also that many of us > construct a persona or multiple personae to interact with others, a > phenomenon known as "masking". > > I understand why "Asshole" can function as a viable mask for many people, > because there are cultures where it's tolerated, particularly in > remote-working groups like mailing lists, where physical altercations are > unlikely and no-one has to confront the results of their interactions with > others if they don't want to. > Just wanted to say thanks for this Adrian- regardless of which position people take on this, I think this serves as a collection of useful insights - as does Eric's contribution. cheers