public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: strub causing libgcc to fail to build on rl78-elf
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 17:28:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36cf0c78-76ac-40e0-87fd-1c73506ba516@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xn1qbzouob.fsf@greed.delorie.com>



On 12/6/23 15:03, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org> writes:
>> This looks like a latent bug in the port.
> 
> I'm not surprised, that port was weird.
> 
>> This was just a plain asm insn in strub.c:
>>
>>    /* Make sure the stack overwrites are not optimized away.  */
>>    asm ("" : : "m" (end[0]));
>>
>> whose constraint passes during reload, rl78_alloc_physical_registers
>> leaves it alone and clears virt_insns_ok, so when cprog_hardreg attempts
>> to extract constraints again, rl78_as_legitimate_address rejects r8 as
>> the address because virt insns are no longer ok.
> 
> Some background: the "virtual" registers are memory-mapped registers
> that use a common addressing scheme to access non-mapped registers.
> When we convert from virtual to physical, we can map that reg to a
> physical reg, or we replace the reg with a mem, but then usually have to
> split up the insn.
> 
> For this insn, "converting" should have mapped or reloaded r8 to a valid
> address register.  I doubt we have a way to have two patterns for user
> asms like we do for, say, addhi3.
Given we don't know the semantics of what goes on inside the MEM I think 
rewriting would be extraordinarily difficult.  Ultimately all this feels 
like a limited reload pass implemented in the rl78 backend.  You'd have 
to look at all the operands, potentially spill one or more values, 
arrange for input/output reloads, deal with clobbers (particularly 
reloading the address given (clobber (mem (addr))).

> 
> I suspect that something in the virt->phys logic just doesn't know how
> to check for mem constraints in user asms.
I looked briefly, it appears the code just punts rewriting all user 
asms, but maybe I missed something.

I wouldn't lose any sleep if we had a way to simply disable strub for rl78.

Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-08  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <7afbb6f4-bc43-4dc1-a691-c84b019bbf58@gmail.com>
2023-12-06 21:24 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-12-06 22:03   ` DJ Delorie
2023-12-08  0:28     ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-12-09  2:18       ` [PATCH] strub: disable on rl78 Alexandre Oliva
2023-12-10 18:27         ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36cf0c78-76ac-40e0-87fd-1c73506ba516@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=oliva@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).