From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:0:465::201]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C992138B3324; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 20:26:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C992138B3324 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=aarsen.me Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aarsen.me Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MvGFb54Kqz9sS1; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:26:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aarsen.me; s=MBO0001; t=1666383971; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H5bimO+C+1PpAXBFD4LgWN35MW22Vl/EFz3xGpWi4SQ=; b=AG1YNRkdFv6PiUu/hfGjzCMd84Pqq1LWVZrgRSPprOrN1RSfNsu9nnU5mGq9Zjvnp1zZ2j l3Udre/kwK+bVHdc6Hy+8s26APl3dlUW8WqwxnwOykN9W02/u+SHK2V7jas+8AJcGnwqVS RoggXl369ewdJbFE/AZNr0qYDbdCaS60wVrVfe6XdlvoXfSAh8odHnhXkIiSU33ihHjTdp Rnd9zsZJglyhAuLFM4u2ZJgxd/StEGsYVBXQRGw/OAQ1DlN0Sg0r7uXKof+Vk9uX009vYO /HT1YZATXi6Q0APFHbiZEgSgZ8abYx9eYGeHhDKf5hr8+tGK3uNj3sB/s0Kuaw== From: Arsen =?utf-8?B?QXJzZW5vdmnEhw==?= To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Joseph Myers , Marek Polacek , Florian Weimer Subject: Re: C2x features status Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:26:08 +0200 Message-ID: <3733648.GzMWCYN1ti@bstg> In-Reply-To: <87r0z16jee.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> References: <7452271.dsUahkEHV4@bstg> <87r0z16jee.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart19912314.bRCgqYNyEr"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MvGFb54Kqz9sS1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --nextPart19912314.bRCgqYNyEr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Arsen =?utf-8?B?QXJzZW5vdmnEhw==?= To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: C2x features status Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:25:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3733648.GzMWCYN1ti@bstg> In-Reply-To: <87r0z16jee.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Friday, 21 October 2022 21:55:53 CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > That's the implicit function declaration/implicit int change. This > won't happen in GCC 13, it's too late for that. I tried to make this > change a couple of years in Fedora, and just flipping the compiler > flag Does Not Work. I hope to get there in time for GCC 14. The tracker also covers what clang calls strict-prototype (which is=20 AFAICT about K&R style prototypes and () arg lists), so I figured it's=20 relevant (but, IIRC, Clang is holding off on making that an error for=20 now, so it was lower priority). > Thank you for sharing the Gentoo tracker. Maybe we can reuse some > patches from there and contribute ours. I trust Gentoo aims to > upstream patches as they become available? Unfortunately, I expect > that a lot of these issues will be in packages that don't have an > active upstream anymore, which makes sharing patches more > challenging. In other cases, we'll just build with -std=3Dgnu89 (e.g. > unzip > , it has > configure-style checking implemented without autoconf). Yes, indeed, the devs that fixed packages did send patches usptream=20 while they worked on this issue. Unfortunately, there is dead=20 upstreams, as you said, so I expect either lingering in-tree patches for=20 issues or compile flag changes like the one for unzip you mentioned. =20 Such contribution and collaboration is more than welcome, though; please=20 do reach out. Thanks, =2D-=20 Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --nextPart19912314.bRCgqYNyEr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEABYKAH0WIQT+4rPRE/wAoxYtYGFSwpQwHqLEkwUCY1MAQ18UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0RkVF MkIzRDExM0ZDMDBBMzE2MkQ2MDYxNTJDMjk0MzAxRUEyQzQ5MwAKCRBSwpQwHqLE k5GHAQC8G0CZC4X67/5Ixmy1fddLyOwYc1oplWs6WboYI9haBwD/ag4Un5S2M9F1 LmH/CZLfFCqKB/ni0cBOkA82MNzCyQQ= =F3Kk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart19912314.bRCgqYNyEr--