public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com, wilson@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: system.h & warnings
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 11:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3740.891547768@hurl.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199804021620.LAA18789@caip.rutgers.edu>

  In message < 199804021620.LAA18789@caip.rutgers.edu >you write:
  > 	One thing I'd like to bring up, the test you used in genoutput.c
  > to see if __attribute__ should be used only checks __GNUC__.  This can
  > fail for stage1 compilers which are gcc but are older versions.  E.g. 
  > these can be either gcc installed by the user or the default compiler
  > (like maybe nextstep? I'll bet it fails there.)
Good point.


  > 	I'd like to put something in gansidecl.h to do a rigorous test
  > once.  Then one can use __attribute__, or macros based on it, more freely. 
Yes, I think putting this into gansidecl.h would be fine.

However, I don't want to go littering too much of the source code
with attributes.  I don't mind in the generated files because we
very rarely have to look at them :-)

  > 	Should I make a patch to put the following in gansidecl.h?
  > 
  > 		--Kaveh
  > 
  >  > #if __GNUC__ < 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 7)
  >  > # define __attribute__(x)
  >  > #endif
  >  > 
  >  > #define ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED __attribute__ ((unused))
  >  > 
  >  > #define ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(m, n) __attribute__ ((format (__printf__, m, n)
  > ))
  >  > #define ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_1 ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(1, 2)
  >  > #define ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_2 ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(2, 3)
  >  > #define ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_3 ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(3, 4)
Why bother with the ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED macro?  It isn't significantly
simpler or easier to read than __attribute__ ((unused)).

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~1998-04-04 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-04-02  8:21 Kaveh R. Ghazi
1998-04-04 11:01 ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-04-01 22:44 Jeffrey A Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3740.891547768@hurl.cygnus.com \
    --to=law@cygnus.com \
    --cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
    --cc=ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=wilson@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).