From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19196 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 17:38:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19116 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 17:38:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 17:38:35 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0GHYq214914; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:34:52 -0800 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:15:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Joe Buck , Robert Dewar cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Message-ID: <39800000.1042738491@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20030116075528.B17601@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00768.txt.bz2 > Now, we don't need to do anything elaborate; a couple of patches to > recognize the most common cases will do. I was just grumbling; my feelings aren't that sensitive. I've already got a patch ready to restore most of what was there, plus fix some actual miscompilations. Testing and making ChangeLogs as I write this... -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com