From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com>
Cc: "'Alexandre Oliva'" <aoliva@redhat.com>, tromey@redhat.com, Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>, java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: dynamic library cost (was RE: libtool, java woes)
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:46:00 -0000
Message-id: <3AD53351.C92358FC@albatross.co.nz>
References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE7009027876644049B5D54@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00524.html

"Boehm, Hans" wrote:

> 3) If object allocation notifications are requested, it does some messy
> JVMPI allocation profiling stuff.  I think this is currently compiled in by
> default?  I don't understand the full history or current status here, but
> I'd be inclined to turn it off by default.

I was not aware that the JVMPI stuff is being compiled in. I agree: it should
be turned off unless "--enable-libgcj-profile" or whatever is given to
configure.

In any case, this (not having _Jv_AllocObject(), at least for common cases) is
is definatly where we want to go. Actually, I think I've mentioned this before
on one of my GCJ wishlist rants ;-)

regards

  [ bryce ]