* high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
@ 2001-06-10 12:46 Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2001-06-10 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: mark
Hi,
In the last 24 hours,
6 bugs were closed - hurrah!
3 new bugs appeared - boo!
3098 - Richard Henderson has this one,
3104 - nobody has this one (well Neil had it for a bit,
then he ran away :-)
3105 - Ben Kosnik has this one.
There are 12 analyzed bugs (6 are unassigned)
There are 4 open bugs.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
2001-06-11 8:44 ` Nathan Sidwell
@ 2001-06-12 14:56 ` Toon Moene
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Toon Moene @ 2001-06-12 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Sidwell; +Cc: Tim Prince, Billinghurst, David (CRTS), gcc
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Tim Prince wrote:
> > I've had several bad libg2c.a builds from 3.0 snapshots in the last
> > week, apparently due to the omission of
> > #include "config.h"
> > from libI77/inquire.c
> > The test suite appears not to check whether inquire is working. inquire
> > breaks whenever configure decides to set NON_UNIX_STDIO but no one tells
> > inquire about it. If NON_UNIX_STDIO is not supported, then don't set
> > it.
> Can you file a bug report about this?
I'm running a make bootstrap / make -k check (C/Fortran only) on
i686-pc-linux-gnu with `#include "config.h"' in libI77/enquire.c [ this
just for regression testing - it won't change anything on this system ]
If succesfull, I'll apply the change to branch and trunk. It's a
regression introduced when trying to solve the FreeBSD breakage due to
the ftruncate fix of REWIND [ yes, I know - you don't want to know ]
Cheers,
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
2001-06-10 21:21 ` Tim Prince
@ 2001-06-11 8:44 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-06-12 14:56 ` Toon Moene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2001-06-11 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Prince; +Cc: Billinghurst, David (CRTS), gcc
Tim Prince wrote:
>
> I've had several bad libg2c.a builds from 3.0 snapshots in the last
> week, apparently due to the omission of
> #include "config.h"
> from libI77/inquire.c
> The test suite appears not to check whether inquire is working. inquire
> breaks whenever configure decides to set NON_UNIX_STDIO but no one tells
> inquire about it. If NON_UNIX_STDIO is not supported, then don't set
> it.
Can you file a bug report about this?
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
2001-06-10 17:00 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
@ 2001-06-10 21:21 ` Tim Prince
2001-06-11 8:44 ` Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tim Prince @ 2001-06-10 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS), 'Nathan Sidwell', gcc
I've had several bad libg2c.a builds from 3.0 snapshots in the last
week, apparently due to the omission of
#include "config.h"
from libI77/inquire.c
The test suite appears not to check whether inquire is working. inquire
breaks whenever configure decides to set NON_UNIX_STDIO but no one tells
inquire about it. If NON_UNIX_STDIO is not supported, then don't set
it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
To: "'Nathan Sidwell'" <nathan@codesourcery.com>; <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
> I beleive 3099 - 100+ cygwin EH failures - should also be high
priority
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nathan Sidwell [SMTP:nathan@codesourcery.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:49 AM
> > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > Cc: mark@codesourcery.com
> > Subject: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
> >
> > Hi,
> > In the last 24 hours,
> > 6 bugs were closed - hurrah!
> > 3 new bugs appeared - boo!
> > 3098 - Richard Henderson has this one,
> > 3104 - nobody has this one (well Neil had it for a bit,
> > then he ran away :-)
> > 3105 - Ben Kosnik has this one.
> >
> > There are 12 analyzed bugs (6 are unassigned)
> > There are 4 open bugs.
> >
> > nathan
> > --
> > Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com ::
CodeSourcery
> > LLC
> > 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
> > nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ :
> > nathan@acm.org
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
@ 2001-06-10 17:00 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2001-06-10 21:21 ` Tim Prince
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Billinghurst, David (CRTS) @ 2001-06-10 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Nathan Sidwell', gcc
I beleive 3099 - 100+ cygwin EH failures - should also be high priority
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Sidwell [SMTP:nathan@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:49 AM
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: mark@codesourcery.com
> Subject: high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
>
> Hi,
> In the last 24 hours,
> 6 bugs were closed - hurrah!
> 3 new bugs appeared - boo!
> 3098 - Richard Henderson has this one,
> 3104 - nobody has this one (well Neil had it for a bit,
> then he ran away :-)
> 3105 - Ben Kosnik has this one.
>
> There are 12 analyzed bugs (6 are unassigned)
> There are 4 open bugs.
>
> nathan
> --
> Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery
> LLC
> 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
> nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ :
> nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* high priority bugs - T minus 6 days
@ 2001-06-09 11:55 Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2001-06-09 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi,
There are now 13 high priority analyzed bugs. 6 of them are unassigned.
The only new one there is 3089, which I am working on.
There are 5 open high priority bugs.
9 high priority bugs have been fixed or downgraded. Hurrah!
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-12 14:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-10 12:46 high priority bugs - T minus 6 days Nathan Sidwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-10 17:00 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2001-06-10 21:21 ` Tim Prince
2001-06-11 8:44 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-06-12 14:56 ` Toon Moene
2001-06-09 11:55 Nathan Sidwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).