Richard Henderson wrote:

>On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:26:43PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
>>Are you moving back to the original loop test?  I think the original 
>>test you had didn't work because it wasn't the doloop case, but if you 
>>put it in the doloop code it should work properly.
>>
>
>I'm taking out the CONT test, yes.  But I'm keeping the LUID
>test against the BIV initializer rather than scanning with
>reg_set_between_p.
>
You will need to set the bl variable a little differently, in case its a 
GIV.  I've attached a patch.  That was the cause of my segv earlier. 
 Bootstrapping again....

-Corey