From: Tom Crispin <crispin@centtech.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: success building 3.0.1 and failure with 3.0.3; and some questions
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C4625C8.CAB3AAD9@centtech.com> (raw)
3.0.1 built successfully last month on my VIA C3 with a RedHat Linux 6.2
kernel 2.2.19, but 3.0.3 is failing with the following:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/.automount/redwood/root/workdirs/crispin/gcc/3.0.3/objdir/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libmath'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile
/n/workdirs/crispin/gcc/3.0.3/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/n/workdirs/crispin/gcc/3.0.3/objdir/gcc/
-B/n/workdirs/crispin/gcc/3.0.3/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/n/workdirs/crispin/gcc/3.0.3/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/n/workdirs/crispin/gcc/3.0.3/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../libstdc++-v3/libmath -I.. -g -O2
-c ../../../../libstdc++-v3/libmath/signbit.c
libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration
libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag'
make[4]: *** [signbit.lo] Error 1
Similar errors occured with libtool that I inferred had to do with
relative versus absolute paths -- changing the relative paths to
absolute in the relevant Makefile corrected the prior problems. But I
am out of clues for this one.
Question 1:
The 3.0.3 documentation describes the 3 stage compilation of gcc, but
the Makefile mentions 4 stages. Since I haven't made it that far, I
assume this is just a problem with the documentation?
Question 2:
I'm in the process of creating patches to support the VIA C3 processor
which I will test with the latest CVS source (once that builds). How do
I build GCC itself using these patches? I assume bootstrap once with
the patch so that a -march=VIAC3 (or whatever) is understood, then
re-compile GCC using the previous version as the "native" compiler and
set the CC FLAGS?
Question 3:
Once that works, where do I tweak the configuration process to
recognize the VIA processor, so that (eventually) I and others won't
have to go through the process of question 2?
Thanks!
--
Tom Crispin
Centaur Technology
512-493-8625
crispin@centtech.com
reply other threads:[~2002-01-17 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C4625C8.CAB3AAD9@centtech.com \
--to=crispin@centtech.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).