From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8629 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2002 08:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8499 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 08:59:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tus001.unitus.it) (193.205.144.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2002 08:59:41 -0000 Received: from unitus.it (SNOM [193.205.145.28]) by tus001.unitus.it with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 1K4HSVFM; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:56:21 +0100 Message-ID: <3C60F090.2040601@unitus.it> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 01:05:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? References: <3C5ADF19.6A6865D9@unitus.it> <20020201104619.C10318@redhat.com> <3C5AE35B.9B7B825D@unitus.it> <20020201105740.F10318@redhat.com> <3C5AE860.2AA390F1@unitus.it> <3C5EBAA8.2070109@unitus.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger wrote: >Tell me if you like to see other runs, > Thank you very much, Andreas. >164.gzip 1400 561 250* 1400 559 250* > >186.crafty 1000 279 358* 1000 279 358* > Really indistinguishable, right? >Est. SPECint_base2000 227 > Est. SPECint2000 227 > Andreas, please excuse my *very* stupid question (for sure I could find this explained somewhere in your pages ;-) How these SPEC indexes compare with those you publish on the WEB? I mean they are roughly half in size. Thanks, Paolo.