From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-50577-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16353 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 10:32:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16331 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 10:32:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tus001.unitus.it) (193.205.144.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 10:32:39 -0000
Received: from unitus.it (SNOM [193.205.145.28]) by tus001.unitus.it with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
	id 296XDX2J; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:28:06 +0200
Message-ID: <3CC68A27.9040007@unitus.it>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 03:42:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
CC:  gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease)
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0204232000250.2524-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01229.txt.bz2

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

>I got mixed results. The binary with the changes above (and all CVS
>changes between Monday and Tuesday)  was somewhat smaller than the
>original. Performance didn't change too much, either way.
>
Thank you very much Gerald.
Indeed, I find those numbers very interesting and very puzzling! 
Definitely I did expect a clear positive effect of the C++ aliasing 
patch... First, I have to learn more about the main features of such C++ 
code.

Ciao, Paolo.