public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ?
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 02:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D38543D.F5D84797@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020719095446.A15598@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 04:40:26PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> > Which begs the question: Is there a reason -fschedule-insns isn't on by
> > default when using -O2 ?

> Yes.  The fact that the scheduler doesn't understand register
> pressure means that pre-register-allocation scheduling generally
> sucks eggs on x86.

Thanks.  Independently from your message and David Edelsohn's (showing the
comment that gives the rationale for turning this option off on ix86) I
came to the same conclusion while having dinner (nothing helps better than
give the grey cells some rest :-)

Now the 64K question is: How can it be that I came around going through all
this trouble because I saw the same "mis-optimization" on the Alpha, where
- given what Daniel showed us - -fschedule-insns is on ?

I'm switching machines as we speak to test this ...

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-19 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-16 14:10 Toon Moene
2002-07-19 11:00 ` Toon Moene
2002-07-19 11:02   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-07-19 11:03     ` David Edelsohn
2002-07-19 13:31   ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-20  2:13     ` Toon Moene [this message]
2002-07-20 11:42       ` Toon Moene
2002-07-20 12:05         ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-20 12:12           ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-21 10:01             ` Toon Moene
2002-07-21 14:23               ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-21 15:14                 ` Toon Moene
2002-07-21 22:41                 ` Toon Moene
2002-07-22  0:03                   ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-22 16:42                     ` Toon Moene
2002-07-23  2:12                       ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-08-12  7:49     ` Jeff Law
2002-08-12  7:53       ` Jan Hubicka
2002-08-12  9:56         ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D38543D.F5D84797@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
    --to=toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).