From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17902 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2002 19:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17853 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2002 19:33:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop.moene.indiv.nluug.nl) (195.109.255.217) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2002 19:33:14 -0000 Received: from local ([127.0.0.1] helo=moene.indiv.nluug.nl) by laptop.moene.indiv.nluug.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Wiwh-0007W4-00; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 21:34:16 +0200 Message-ID: <3D3C5E23.9F89015F@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:42:00 -0000 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Henderson CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? References: <3D346B28.47039CD9@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <3D3824DA.B198DC39@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20020719095446.A15598@redhat.com> <3D38543D.F5D84797@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <3D386E94.E6D03C8B@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20020719153514.B15706@redhat.com> <20020719170330.A15734@redhat.com> <3D3A7DB0.A134B3A6@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20020721095454.A22181@redhat.com> <3D3B347B.928BA286@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20020721173159.A22460@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01043.txt.bz2 Richard Henderson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:23:55AM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: > > OK, you won. > Excellent. I've checked things in. Well, that helped. Look at the SPECfp scores on Andreas' site ! -- Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)