Re: Results for 3.3 20020814 (experimental) testsuite oni586-redhat-linux-gnu

Re: Results for 3.3 20020814 (experimental) testsuite oni586-redhat-linux-gnu

[Gcc k6 testing account]

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Manfred Hollstein wrote:

> Gcc k6 testing account wrote:
> > Gcc bootstrap for target k6-redhat-linux-gnu on the following system
> > ====================================================================
> > 
> > Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla)
> > Kernel 2.4.19 on an i586
> > 
> > Gnu C                  2.96
> > binutils               2.11.93.0.2
> > Linux C Library        2.2.5
> > Dynamic linker (ldd)   2.2.5
> > 
> > RPM versions:
> > gcc-2.96-112
> > binutils-2.11.93.0.2-11
> > glibc-2.2.5-39
> > dejagnu-1.4.2-3
> > ====================================================================
> > LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 15 00:07:49 UTC 2002
> > 
> > Native configuration is i586-redhat-linux-gnu
> > 
> > 		=== g++ tests ===
> > 
> > 
> > Running target unix
> > FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C  (test for warnings, line 5)
> > FAIL: g++.jason/pmf7.C  Execution test
> > FAIL: g++.jason/template26.C  Execution test
> > 
> > 		=== g++ Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes		7490
> > # of unexpected failures	3
> > # of expected failures		86
> > # of untested testcases		9
> > # of unsupported tests		3
> > /home/caligula/cvs/HEAD/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3 20020814 (experimental)
> > 
> > 		=== g77 tests ===
> > 
> > 
> > Running target unix
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O0 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O1 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O2 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -O3 -g 
> > FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution,  -Os 
> > 
> > 		=== g77 Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes		1618
> > # of unexpected failures	8
> > # of unsupported tests		8
> > /home/caligula/cvs/HEAD/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.3 20020814 (experimental)
> > 
> > 		=== gcc tests ===
> > 
> > 
> > Running target unix
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O1  
> > WARNING: program timed out.
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O2  
> > WARNING: program timed out.
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
> > WARNING: program timed out.
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -g  
> > XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c execution,  -Os 
> > 
> > 		=== gcc Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes		19496
> > # of unexpected failures	4
> > # of unexpected successes	1
> > # of expected failures		63
> > # of unsupported tests		62
> > /home/caligula/cvs/HEAD/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 3.3 20020814 (experimental)
> > 
> > 		=== objc tests ===
> > 
> > 
> > Running target unix
> > 
> > 		=== objc Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes		1045
> > # of expected failures		6
> > /home/caligula/cvs/HEAD/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 3.3 20020814 (experimental)
> > 
> > 		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
> > 
> > 
> > Running target unix
> > XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/members.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/messages_byname.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/messages_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_byname.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_byname.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_char.cc execution test
> > XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
> > FAIL: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
> > 
> > 		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes		417
> > # of unexpected failures	1
> > # of unexpected successes	26
> > # of expected failures		1
> > 
> > Compiler version: 3.3 20020814 (experimental) 
> > Platform: i586-redhat-linux-gnu
> > configure flags: --prefix=/opt/k6/HEAD --host=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --target=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --build=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77,java --enable-threads=posix
> > 
> 
> You explicitly enabled java, however, I don't see any testresults.
> Did your build fail for libjava?
> 
> TIA, cheers.
> 
> l8er
> manfred
> 

Ave Manfred.

The testresults-mail you saw is generated by a script that does a make 
bootstrap and if the bootstrap is succesfull does a make -k check  and 
then sends the testresults. So at least the bootstrap is succesfull.
The script doesn't install the bootstrapped compiler,but deletes the 
objdir and then makes a tarball of the tree. 

There are a couple of testresults-mail from this computer of gcc-3.3 and 
none seem to have java testresults in them. So it seems that java 
bootstraps ok,but doesn't do the make -k check very well.

I'm going tot start a new bootstrap/check cycle tonight and keep the 
objdir so I can try to install it and look in the .sum and .log files.

You can see the logfiles/cvs-tree and script at 
cam029208.student.utwente.nl/~caligula.
As soon as you see a new testresults mail from this computer,you will see 
a HEAD directory on the webpage and can investigate :)

Please feel free to ask more questions if you need to. 
I'm willing to try k6 specific patches anytime.

Greetz 
Martijn Uffing

Re: Results for 3.3 20020814 (experimental) testsuite on i586-redhat-linux-gnu

[Manfred Hollstein]

Gcc k6 testing account wrote:

Re: Results for 3.3 20020814 (experimental) testsuite oni586-redhat-linux-gnu

[Gcc k6 testing account]

On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Manfred Hollstein wrote:

> Gcc k6 testing account wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> > [...]
> >>>Compiler version: 3.3 20020814 (experimental) 
> >>>Platform: i586-redhat-linux-gnu
> >>>configure flags: --prefix=/opt/k6/HEAD --host=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --target=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --build=k6-redhat-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77,java --enable-threads=posix
> >>>
> >>
> >>You explicitly enabled java, however, I don't see any testresults.
> >>Did your build fail for libjava?
> >>
> >>TIA, cheers.
> >>
> >>l8er
> >>manfred
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Ave Manfred.
> > 
> > The testresults-mail you saw is generated by a script that does a make 
> > bootstrap and if the bootstrap is succesfull does a make -k check  and 
> > then sends the testresults. So at least the bootstrap is succesfull.
> 
> Does your script exit if the bootstrap fails? IIRC, libjava is
> built as the final step of make bootstrap, so it might well be, that
> bootstrap *is* actually failing. FWIW, I didn't see any libjava
> related results in your posting from 20020815 either.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> l8er
> manfred
> 


My script exits if the bootstrap fails.
You can see it at cam029208.student.utwente.nl/~caligula/
the bootstrap script is bootstrap_en_test_var.sh.

I installed the last bootstrapped HEAD compiler and it installs libgcj!
But on the gcc list there's a discussion going on about failing java test 
on more architectures. There's also  some discussion about patches so I 
think the failing libjava tests are not specific for k6.
If the problem continues for let's say two weeks,I'm gonnna bootstrap a 
i586 and k6 compiler from the same sources and see if there any difference 
in testresults.



Greetinx Martijn Uffing