From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61118-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9883 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2002 09:50:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9875 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2002 09:50:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail02.agrinet.ch) (212.28.134.115)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2002 09:50:34 -0000
Received: from pop.agri.ch (217.162.33.48) by mail02.agrinet.ch (NPlex 5.5.060) (authenticated as toa@pop.agri.ch)
        id 3D9B635F00012729; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:50:33 +0200
Message-ID: <3D9EB5F3.2050607@pop.agri.ch>
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 03:33:00 -0000
From: Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  gcc@gcc.gnu.org
CC:  mark@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
References: <20021003235922.A27578@lucon.org> <20021004094556.A1711@us.ibm.com> <20021004094724.A20284@lucon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2

H. J. Lu wrote:

>>>/export/build/gnu/gcc-3.2/build-i686-linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/stl_rope.h:609: no
>>>   type named `allocator_type' in `struct __gnu_cxx::_Rope_rep_base<char, 
>>>   std::allocator<char> >'
[]
> Mark, Andreas has identified your patch breaks both mainline and 3.2:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00231.html
> 
> Shouldn't we revert it at least on the 3.2 branch?

What is about the trunk? Do we wait?

Thanks,
Andreas