From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65495-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13017 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2002 21:00:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13008 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 21:00:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.cp.tin.it) (212.216.176.221)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2002 21:00:27 -0000
Received: from unitus.it (80.181.224.119) by smtp1.cp.tin.it (6.5.029)
        id 3DEDBCA0009BA57C; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:00:14 +0100
Message-ID: <3E1205C3.3060101@unitus.it>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:55:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
CC: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>,  gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC still getting a lot slower
References: <20021231204432.GA22313@daikokuya.co.uk> <3E120414.6030003@unitus.it> <20021231205552.GA22398@daikokuya.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20021231205552.GA22398@daikokuya.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01669.txt.bz2

Neil Booth wrote:

>>Wild guess
>>
>>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2002-12/msg00481.html
>>
>>???
>>    
>>
>If so, ugh.  Fat chance of finding out exactly what it was.
>
Yes :-(
And unfortuntely the culprit is exactly the merge itself. See:

    http://www.suse.de/~aj/SPEC/CINT/sandbox-bib/Bootstrap-time_big.png

Paolo.