From: "Branko Čibej" <brane@xbc.nu>
To: Marcel Cox <marcel_cox@hotmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 21:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E1B49CB.1030702@xbc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avfdos$h95$1@main.gmane.org>
Marcel Cox wrote:
>Finally, here is a short sample problem which shows that GCC (3.21 tested
>here) is both better and worse than some people think or have claimed in
>this thread:
>
>void touch(void *, void *, void *);
>
>void testinit(void)
>{
> int i=0,j=0,k=0;
> char buffer[256];
>
> touch(&i,&j,&k);
> i+=k;
> touch(&i,&j,&k);
>}
>
>
One question: couldn't the compiler simply elide "buffer", since there
are no references to it?
--
Brane ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-07 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-06 20:59 Robert Dewar
2003-01-07 5:29 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-07 21:49 ` Marcel Cox
2003-01-07 21:55 ` Branko Čibej [this message]
2003-01-07 21:55 ` Marcel Cox
2003-01-08 17:32 ` Tom Lord
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-08 12:27 Robert Dewar
2003-01-08 12:13 Robert Dewar
2003-01-08 12:21 ` Lars Segerlund
2003-01-08 5:36 Robert Dewar
2003-01-07 21:01 Marcel Cox
2003-01-07 22:53 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-08 1:05 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-08 1:22 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-08 11:45 ` Marcel Cox
2003-01-08 17:29 ` Marcel Cox
2003-01-07 17:19 Robert Dewar
2003-01-07 15:17 Robert Dewar
2003-01-07 17:02 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-08 6:56 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-08 12:14 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-07 12:32 Robert Dewar
2003-01-07 19:03 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-07 19:20 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-08 7:52 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-08 19:29 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-08 20:10 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-08 20:44 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-08 21:34 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-08 22:05 ` tm_gccmail
2003-01-08 6:08 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-07 12:08 Robert Dewar
2003-01-07 12:10 ` Momchil Velikov
2003-01-05 15:47 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 22:14 ` Tom Lord
2003-01-05 14:08 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 16:50 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-06 19:42 ` Tom Lord
2003-01-06 8:06 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-06 22:45 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-07 6:04 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-05 14:05 Robert Dewar
2003-01-06 19:42 ` Tom Lord
2003-01-06 6:49 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-05 13:13 Robert Dewar
2003-01-06 4:40 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-06 16:46 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-07 5:20 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-06 19:42 ` Tom Lord
2003-01-06 6:39 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-06 6:50 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-01-06 9:00 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-05 11:41 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 16:30 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-06 4:53 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-06 19:50 ` Tom Lord
2003-01-06 6:29 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-06 21:53 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-07 6:02 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-07 17:41 ` Janis Johnson
2003-01-04 18:12 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 14:50 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 18:00 ` Denis Chertykov
2003-01-05 5:53 ` Andy Walker
2003-01-05 5:43 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-27 5:47 Chris Lattner
2002-12-29 0:35 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-29 5:58 ` Chris Lattner
2002-12-29 6:26 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-29 12:04 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-29 13:58 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-12-29 22:41 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-29 15:50 ` Diego Novillo
2002-12-29 22:44 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-30 1:30 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-30 2:57 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-30 7:52 ` Michael S. Zick
2002-12-29 7:44 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-29 12:10 ` Andy Walker
2002-12-30 20:58 ` James Mansion
2002-12-31 3:56 ` Michael S. Zick
2002-12-30 1:09 ` Michael S. Zick
2002-12-30 7:27 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-30 10:25 ` Michael S. Zick
2002-12-30 20:50 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E1B49CB.1030702@xbc.nu \
--to=brane@xbc.nu \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=marcel_cox@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).