public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reza Roboubi <reza@linisoft.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimizations
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 05:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E24A767.F9CDAFB0@linisoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E499A65-2803-11D7-9221-00039372607E@physics.uc.edu>

Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> What version of gcc?
> This seems like it was fixed at one point doing the 3.x series because
> it does not happen with 3.3 (prerelease) or 3.4 (experimental).

Ah. I am using gcc version 3.2. It's very good if this has been fixed under 3.3
and 3.4. 

I would still appreciate any comments regarding the status of these
optimizations. Are these new features, or are they old ones that temporarily got
broken during gcc 3.2?

What part of the gcc source tree deals with these optimizations?

Thanks again.

> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> 
> On Tuesday, Jan 14, 2003, at 12:35 US/Pacific, Reza Roboubi wrote:
> 
> > In the following code, it is clear that the return value of mm() can be
> > eliminated.  In fact, many optimizations are possible here.  Yet gcc
> > seems not
> > to be able to do these optimizations.  Below, I posted the assembly
> > code that
> > gcc generated (for the while() loop).
> >
> > I compiled this code with gcc -O2 -Wall.
> >
> > I was wondering if I am doing something wrong.  If not, then please
> > comment on
> > current gcc developments in this regard, and what it takes to add some
> > of these
> > features.
> >
> > Please also comment on how other compilers would compare with gcc in
> > this case.
> >
> > Are there any non-obvious remedies you have for this case?
> >
> > PS: Please tell me if I must report this as a gcc bug.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help you provide.
> >
> >
> > inline int mm(int *i)
> > {
> >         if((*i)==0x10){return 0;}
> >         (*i)++;return 1;
> > }
> >
> > int
> > main(){
> >
> >       int k=0;
> >       while (mm(&k)){}
> >       write(1,&k,1);
> >
> >       return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
> > Associated assembly code for the while() loop:
> >
> > 0x80483b0 <main+16>:  mov    0xfffffffc(%ebp),%eax
> > 0x80483b3 <main+19>:  xor    %edx,%edx
> > 0x80483b5 <main+21>:  cmp    $0x10,%eax
> > 0x80483b8 <main+24>:  je     0x80483c3 <main+35>
> > 0x80483ba <main+26>:  inc    %eax
> > 0x80483bb <main+27>:  mov    $0x1,%edx
> > 0x80483c0 <main+32>:  mov    %eax,0xfffffffc(%ebp)
> > 0x80483c3 <main+35>:  test   %edx,%edx
> > 0x80483c5 <main+37>:  jne    0x80483b0 <main+16>
> >

-- 
Reza Roboubi
IT Solution Provider: 
   Software Development; Data Servers; Embedded Devices.
www.linisoft.com

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-15  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-14 22:58 optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-15  0:15 ` optimizations Andrew Pinski
2003-01-15  5:10   ` Reza Roboubi [this message]
2003-01-15  6:31     ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-15 17:37       ` optimizations Andrew Pinski
2003-01-15 17:46         ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-15 23:20 optimizations Bonzini
2003-01-16 10:53 ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-16 11:03   ` optimizations tm_gccmail
2003-01-16 12:34     ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-02-18 18:13       ` optimizations Håkan Hjort
2003-02-18 18:16         ` optimizations Andrew Pinski
2003-02-18 18:17         ` optimizations Zack Weinberg
2003-02-18 18:40           ` optimizations Håkan Hjort
2003-02-19  5:02           ` optimizations David Edelsohn
2003-01-16 11:53   ` optimizations Paolo Bonzini
2000-03-10  1:46 Optimizations Virgil Palanciuc
1997-12-14 14:30 [EGCS] Optimizations meissner
1997-12-15  5:38 ` Optimizations Marc Lehmann
1997-12-15 11:29   ` Optimizations Dave Love
1997-12-15 15:43     ` Optimizations Marc Lehmann
     [not found] ` <19971216000653.24186.cygnus.egcs@cerebro.laendle>
1997-12-23  7:51   ` Optimizations Stan Cox
1997-12-09  9:52 Optimizations David M. Ronis
1997-12-09 11:19 ` Optimizations Jeffrey A Law
1997-12-10 10:46 ` [EGCS] Optimizations Marc Lehmann
1997-12-14  5:39   ` Philipp Thomas
1997-12-14 15:14     ` Optimizations Marc Lehmann
1997-12-14 20:14       ` Optimizations Jeffrey A Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E24A767.F9CDAFB0@linisoft.com \
    --to=reza@linisoft.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=pinskia@physics.uc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).