From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-66255-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2518 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2003 23:48:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2497 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2003 23:48:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO linisoft.localdomain) (24.80.72.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2003 23:48:54 -0000
Received: from linisoft.com (IDENT:reza@linisoft.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by linisoft.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA19184;
	Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:46:04 -0800
Message-ID: <3E25F2BB.BA90B2C9@linisoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:34:00 -0000
From: Reza Roboubi <reza@linisoft.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimizations
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0301151338040.30377-100000@mail.kloo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2

tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net wrote:
[snap]
> I mentioned this on the gcc-bugs mailing list, and Mark Mitchell
> contributed a fairly simple load hoisting improvement to the loop
> optmiizer which restored performance on Whetstone.
> 
> If you look at the gcc-bugs archives for 1998, you may be able to find
> this message thread.
[snap]

Thanks for this input. It would be interesting to see how the issue was fixed.