public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GCC 3.3 3.4 ...
@ 2003-01-31 13:36 Lars Segerlund
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Lars Segerlund @ 2003-01-31 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc


  From following the list I have a humble opinion to express, and that 
is that perhaps there is a need for more awareness of memory 
footprint/usage and compiler speed issues. What I am saying is that 
there might be a rationale for making this a target in future 
developement/releases.

  It seem's that there is a lot that can be done in this area, and that 
the developement so far mostly have focused on code quality and 
features, ( code quality refers to the generated code here ).

  However, there seems to be more urgent issues such as regression and 
new functionality in the backend that are prioritized.

  Also a review of some of the algorithms used would perhaps be of great 
value.

  / regards, Lars Segerlund.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-01-31 10:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-31 13:36 GCC 3.3 3.4 Lars Segerlund

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).