From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-70880-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19403 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 16:15:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19394 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 16:15:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kanga.comsys.se) (62.95.120.145)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 16:15:32 -0000
Received: from comsys.se (zeta.sys.energyx.se [192.168.0.39])
        (authenticated (0 bits))
        by kanga.sys.energyx.se (8.12.0.Beta19/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19) with ESMTP id h2OGFUUr018048
        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:15:31 +0100
Message-ID: <3E7F2F22.70205@comsys.se>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:04:00 -0000
From: Lars Segerlund <lars.segerlund@comsys.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030319 Debian/1.3-3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Question about boehmgc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01463.txt.bz2


  Is the garbage the only way to handle memory currently under gcc ?

  I.e. was the old memory handling removed when the garbage was introduced ?

  I am asking since I am looking into gcc memory use and alloction, ( 
trying to learn what goes on ).

  / Lars Segerlund.