From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-71257-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10439 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2003 00:11:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10431 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 00:11:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.euronet.nl) (194.134.35.133)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 00:11:19 -0000
Received: from koffie.nl (unknown [194.134.214.37])
	by smtp1.euronet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 349FB67260; Tue,  1 Apr 2003 02:11:15 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <3E88D929.70900@koffie.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:11:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@koffie.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: long long bit-fields
References: <87of3taur5.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>	<3E87B155.3020408@koffie.nl> <87wuig2gcr.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <87wuig2gcr.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2

Falk Hueffner wrote:
> How about:
> 
>     struct { unsigned long long ull31a: 33; } x = { -1 };
>     printf("%016llx\n", (x.ull31a << 48) >> 48);
> 
> We don't currently promote to signed long long if it fits. Should we?

Yes.  But IMHO, of course.


Segher