From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17914 invoked by alias); 17 May 2003 15:21:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17904 invoked from network); 17 May 2003 15:21:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail02.agrinet.ch) (212.28.134.115) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2003 15:21:51 -0000 Received: from pop.agri.ch (217.162.232.206) by mail02.agrinet.ch (7.0.015) (authenticated as toa@pop.agri.ch) id 3EBAC9400006F922; Sat, 17 May 2003 17:21:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3EC65389.9040302@pop.agri.ch> Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 15:39:00 -0000 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ronald Oussoren CC: Dale Johannesen , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX) References: <465A16CC-882D-11D7-8ACF-0003931CFE24@cistron.nl> In-Reply-To: <465A16CC-882D-11D7-8ACF-0003931CFE24@cistron.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01659.txt.bz2 Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On Saturday, May 17, 2003, at 07:52 Europe/Amsterdam, Andreas Tobler wrote: Hm, Amsterdam? I live in Zürich.... :) >> Hey great, people are using libffi on darwin-ppc. > > And were very glad this is available on darwin-ppc, libffi is a very > usefull library. Fine, let me know if you need some more functionality. I implemented the closure stuff only for libjava. And I seem to be one of the only persons using that. But hopefully soon I get the libjava on darwin that far that everyone can use it. > >> I guess this is born on my camp. I'll have a look at, as soon as time >> allows here. >> It is possible that I didn't finish the libffi regarding structures >> since I didn't need it for libjava work. So, you could be right. > > > I just noticed that this might well be stupidity on my part, I tried to > write a minimal program that demonstrates the problem and that runs > without problems. Our real code builds ffi_cifs and ffi_closures at > runtime, and maybe that code is bogus. Could be, but if I remember right, I didn't complete the structure passings. Maybe it works, but if not, then I certainly have to check again. Well, I'll do that anyway. > > Sorry about the inconvenience, no worry, you give me some kick to go over again :) Thanks, Andreas