From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28307 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2003 16:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28300 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2003 16:52:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Aug 2003 16:52:15 -0000 Received: from twcny.rr.com (syr-24-24-19-44.twcny.rr.com [24.24.19.44]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h73GqEiY020753; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 12:52:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F2D3DB6.5030007@twcny.rr.com> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:54:00 -0000 From: Nathanael Nerode User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: multilibbing libgfortran References: <3F2D20A5.9000708@twcny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Nathanael Nerode writes: > > > Unfortunately exact enough - but too late. I'd prefer to have > libgfortran earlier multi-libbed if possible so that it can get better > tested. > > So, what needs to be done to get this multi-libbed? I tried copying > some stuff from libstdc++-v3 and failed with automake problems :-( > > Andreas The current multilibbing scheme is demented, in my opinion. I still recommend not multilibbing at the moment; when multilibbing is moved to the top level, you'll have to rip all the multilib code back *out* of gfortran. You can still test gfortran with each individual library configuration directly, you know, right?