From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32398 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2003 19:31:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32379 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 19:30:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vsmtp4.tin.it) (212.216.176.224) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 19:30:56 -0000 Received: from ims1d.cp.tin.it (212.216.176.58) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.0.019) id 3F8C844B004DC234; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:30:40 +0200 Received: from [192.168.70.225] by ims1d.cp.tin.it with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:30:40 +0200 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3F8C9C4500010424@ims1d.cp.tin.it> From: "Giovanni Visciano" Subject: Re: gcj segmentation fault To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: "Andrew Haley" , "Andrew Pinski" , gcc@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01096.txt.bz2 >-- Messaggio originale -- >From: Andrew Haley >Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:46:59 +0100 >To: Jeff Sturm >Cc: Andrew Pinski , > Giovanni Visciano , , > >Subject: Re: gcj segmentation fault > > > >Jeff Sturm writes: > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > my binutils: > > > > binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4 > > > > > > From : > > > As of GCC 3.3, binutils 2.13.1 or later is required for this platform. > > > See bug 10877 for more information. > > > > The backtrace doesn't look right for 10877, which is related to > > relocations, not EH. > >Yeah, but one truly evil binutils bug *is* related to EH. > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00352.html >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00471.html > >Andrew. with binutils 2.13.90, it works thanks Giovanni