* Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
@ 2003-12-08 18:24 Giovanni Bajo
2003-12-08 18:24 ` Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Giovanni Bajo @ 2003-12-08 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: gcc, Gerald Pfeifer, Andreas Jaeger
Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it> wrote:
>> 2003-10-09 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>> * config.gcc: Remove redundant thread_file setting clauses for
>> various *-*-linux* targets.
>
> I reverted this patch and I'm bootstrapping now. For reference, it's:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg00715.html
> cvs diff -u -r 1.394 -r 1.395 config.gcc | patch -R
>
> Let's see if it helps.
Alas it doesn't. I also reverted this:
2003-10-08 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
* config.gcc: Don't accept --enable-threads=pthreads. Clean
up related case statements.
* configure.in: Don't accept --enable-threads=pthreads,
decosf1, mach, or os2 (none of which work anyway). Alphabetize
supported thread files in case clause.
* configure: Regenerate.
and bootstrap is still broken. I'll try reverting also the third Paolo
suggested now.
Giovanni Bajo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
2003-12-08 18:24 pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
@ 2003-12-08 18:24 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 18:48 ` Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2003-12-08 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Giovanni Bajo; +Cc: gcc
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>and bootstrap is still broken. I'll try reverting also the third Paolo
>suggested now.
>
>
Hi Giovanni. Consider, however, that I'm not a configury expert and
didn't actually analyze the content of those patches. Perhaps, it's
something more recent, perhaps it's a complex interaction between old
and recent commits. I can only tell one thing for sure: nothing threads
related changed in the libstdc++-v3 directory and if I revert the
compiler to three days ago:
cvs -z9 update -D "3 days ago"
and then the library:
cvs -z9 update -A
everything is OK, just done on x86_64.
Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
2003-12-08 18:24 ` Paolo Carlini
@ 2003-12-08 18:48 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 18:59 ` Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2003-12-08 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: Giovanni Bajo, gcc
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> cvs -z9 update -D "3 days ago"
Also OK for -D "2 days ago"...
Now checking -D "1 day ago".
Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
2003-12-08 18:48 ` Paolo Carlini
@ 2003-12-08 18:59 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 19:25 ` Janis Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2003-12-08 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: Giovanni Bajo, gcc
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Now checking -D "1 day ago".
BROKEN!
Now checking -D "36 hours ago".
Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)
2003-12-08 18:59 ` Paolo Carlini
@ 2003-12-08 19:25 ` Janis Johnson
2003-12-08 19:39 ` Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)) Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Janis Johnson @ 2003-12-08 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: Giovanni Bajo, gcc
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:49:00PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> > Now checking -D "1 day ago".
>
> BROKEN!
>
> Now checking -D "36 hours ago".
Sounds like you need automated regression hunting tools.
Janis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline))
2003-12-08 19:25 ` Janis Johnson
@ 2003-12-08 19:39 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 20:47 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2003-12-08 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Janis Johnson; +Cc: Paolo Carlini, Giovanni Bajo, gcc, neroden
Janis Johnson wrote:
> Sounds like you need automated regression hunting tools.
Yes ;) Could you possibly help?
But we are already quite close: the breakage happened between 36 and
24 hours ago, and the candidates are the changes to gcc/aclocal.m4,
gcc/configure and gcc/configure.in that happened in that time span.
Just a couple of commits: can you help pinpointing the exact one?
2003-12-07 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
* configure.in, aclocal.m4: Revert to pre-2.5x conversion status.
* configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.13.
* configure.in: Replace AC_INIT, AC_OUTPUT, AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM
with modern equivalents.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.in: Replace gcc_AC_CHECK_TYPE with AC_CHECK_TYPE.
* aclocal.m4 (gcc_AC_CHECK_TYPE): Remove.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate with (preferred) autoconf 2.57.
* doc/install.texi: Note that 'gcc' is now a 2.57 directory.
2003-12-07 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
* configure.in: Make minimum necessary changes for autoconf 2.5x.
* aclocal.m4: Make minimum necessary changes for autoconf 2.5x.
* configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.58.
Thanks!
Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline))
2003-12-08 19:39 ` Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)) Paolo Carlini
@ 2003-12-08 20:47 ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-12-09 6:46 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2003-12-08 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: Janis Johnson, Paolo Carlini, Giovanni Bajo, gcc, neroden
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1259 bytes --]
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes:
> Janis Johnson wrote:
>
>> Sounds like you need automated regression hunting tools.
>
> Yes ;) Could you possibly help?
>
> But we are already quite close: the breakage happened between 36 and
> 24 hours ago, and the candidates are the changes to gcc/aclocal.m4,
> gcc/configure and gcc/configure.in that happened in that time span.
>
> Just a couple of commits: can you help pinpointing the exact one?
I gues it's this change but I'm double checking this right now...
--- ChangeLog 7 Dec 2003 14:13:53 -0000 2.1950
+++ ChangeLog 7 Dec 2003 16:12:26 -0000 2.1951
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
2003-12-07 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
+ * configure.in, aclocal.m4: Revert to pre-2.5x conversion status.
+ * configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.13.
+
* configure.in: Replace AC_INIT, AC_OUTPUT, AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM
with modern equivalents.
* configure: Regenerate.
So, somehow the reversion or the regeneration was not ok.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline))
2003-12-08 20:47 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2003-12-09 6:46 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2003-12-09 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: Janis Johnson, Paolo Carlini, Giovanni Bajo, gcc, neroden
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 997 bytes --]
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> I gues it's this change but I'm double checking this right now...
>
> --- ChangeLog 7 Dec 2003 14:13:53 -0000 2.1950
> +++ ChangeLog 7 Dec 2003 16:12:26 -0000 2.1951
> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
> 2003-12-07 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> + * configure.in, aclocal.m4: Revert to pre-2.5x conversion status.
> + * configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.13.
> +
> * configure.in: Replace AC_INIT, AC_OUTPUT, AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM
> with modern equivalents.
> * configure: Regenerate.
>
> So, somehow the reversion or the regeneration was not ok.
Sorry Nerode for blaming your change - it was Giovanni's patch that
happened also in that range and I was too focused on this :-(
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-09 6:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-08 18:24 pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
2003-12-08 18:24 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 18:48 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 18:59 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 19:25 ` Janis Johnson
2003-12-08 19:39 ` Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)) Paolo Carlini
2003-12-08 20:47 ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-12-09 6:46 ` Andreas Jaeger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).