From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15915 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2003 07:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15904 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2003 07:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta6.wss.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.85.37) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 07:43:53 -0000 Received: from specifixinc.com (24.7.123.142) by mta6.wss.scd.yahoo.com (7.0.016) (authenticated as jim@tuliptree.org) id 3F61657402AF4E95; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:43:48 -0800 Message-ID: <3FD8205C.6080504@specifixinc.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:59:00 -0000 From: Jim Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030716 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Umar Janjua CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Register Spilling References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 Umar Janjua wrote: > Are the register spilled values laid out in memory following > some particular scheme or randomly? They are first come first served. The first one spilled gets the first available stack slot, etc. There have been some proposals to sort them, offhand I don't know if there are patches available anywhere for this. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com