From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31723 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2009 09:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31699 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2009 09:37:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f225.google.com) (209.85.218.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:37:23 +0000 Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so1967774bwz.8 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:37:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.162.143 with SMTP id v15mr4955439bkx.50.1252921040618; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:37:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909082046.02004.sebastien.bourdeauducq@lekernel.net> References: <200909082046.02004.sebastien.bourdeauducq@lekernel.net> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3a947d1d0909140237q5d3d1f3l68945faa33eb87c5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: LatticeMico32 support in GCC 4.5 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Bourdeauducq?= To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Hi, Do you have news regarding this? Thanks S=E9bastien ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: S=E9bastien Bourdeauducq Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:46:01 +0200 Subject: LatticeMico32 support in GCC 4.5 To: gnu@gnu.org Hi, Would you mind including support for the LatticeMico32 soft processor in the upcoming GCC 4.5 series? We at Milkymist [1] develop a free system-on-chip design [2] that uses the Mico32 processor and having out-of-the box Mico32 support in GCC would help software development on this free SoC platform. Support for Mico32 is already included in recent binutils releases. A patch [3] was submitted to the GCC mailing list last December, that we are currently using with GCC 4.4. It seems pretty stable as it allows us to compile a working Linux kernel [4]. Looking forward to your positive answer, S=E9bastien Bourdeauducq [1] http://www.milkymist.org [2] http://www.milkymist.org/doc/paper_overview.pdf [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg01024/lm32.patch [4] http://lekernel.net/blog/?p=3D540