* Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
[not found] <00030222114401.01131@enzo.bigblue.local>
@ 2000-03-02 16:04 ` Philipp Thomas
2000-03-03 2:54 ` Franz Sirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Thomas @ 2000-03-02 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Franz Sirl; +Cc: gcc-patches, gcc
* Franz Sirl (Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com) [20000302 22:11]:
> * sysv4.h (CPP_OS_LINUX_SPEC): Define __unix and __linux according
> to given options.
Isn't __something reserved for C library namespace (in contrast to
__something__)? If so, we should get rid of them, not add them.
Philipp
--
Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrenstrasse 15-29, 90429 Nuremberg
Why have my own oppinions? That's what my signature database is for!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
2000-03-02 16:04 ` PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC Philipp Thomas
@ 2000-03-03 2:54 ` Franz Sirl
2000-03-07 15:10 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Franz Sirl @ 2000-03-03 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philipp Thomas; +Cc: gcc-patches, gcc
At 01:04 03.03.00, Philipp Thomas wrote:
>* Franz Sirl (Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com) [20000302 22:11]:
>
> > * sysv4.h (CPP_OS_LINUX_SPEC): Define __unix and __linux according
> > to given options.
>
>Isn't __something reserved for C library namespace (in contrast to
>__something__)? If so, we should get rid of them, not add them.
Well, I will only leave it out if the other platforms change this as well
(and change it for gcc-2.95.3), esp. x86. I definitely don't want to carry
this around as a special thing for Linux/PPC that may break applications
(eg. vixie-cron) and then argue with the maintainers :-(.
Franz.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
2000-03-03 2:54 ` Franz Sirl
@ 2000-03-07 15:10 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2000-03-07 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Franz Sirl; +Cc: Philipp Thomas, gcc-patches, gcc
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 11:53:26AM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> At 01:04 03.03.00, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> >Isn't __something reserved for C library namespace (in contrast to
> >__something__)? If so, we should get rid of them, not add them.
I don't believe there's a distinction made between the library
namespace and the compiler namespace.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-03-07 15:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <00030222114401.01131@enzo.bigblue.local>
2000-03-02 16:04 ` PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC Philipp Thomas
2000-03-03 2:54 ` Franz Sirl
2000-03-07 15:10 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).