From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7545 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 05:52:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7538 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 05:52:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mtaw4.prodigy.net) (64.164.98.52) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 05:52:32 -0000 Received: from bothner.com (adsl-216-102-199-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.199.253]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0H5qPhX024970; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:52:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4008CD99.6080501@bothner.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:52:00 -0000 From: Per Bothner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Diego Novillo CC: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline References: <10401170324.AA15949@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1074309907.3147.139.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1074309907.3147.139.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01026.txt.bz2 Diego Novillo wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 22:24, Richard Kenner wrote: > > >>Remember that the last time we had the discussion of the timing of tree-ssa, >>people claimed it was "essential" for 3.5 since there was a tremendous >>improvement on some C++ cases. So let's see those cases. >> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12747 Can you give numbers? I.e. how much faster does that (or a similar) testcase run? Have we met Kenner's 2x goal? -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/