From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32624 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 17:51:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32611 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 17:51:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 17:51:40 -0000 Received: from gnat.com (hoosic.gnat.com [205.232.38.102]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE56F2DAB; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:51:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4009762E.9040503@gnat.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:51:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gcc mailing list Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200401170151.i0H1pjEn020723@caip.rutgers.edu> <1074310588.3147.153.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200401171704.i0HH4WWn015521@caip.rutgers.edu> <40096DA9.9010905@coyotegulch.com> <400972E0.5010800@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01087.txt.bz2 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Robert Dewar wrote: > In that case, presumably as GNU Ada maintainer you consider the Ada front > end documentation included in GCC CVS as a fundamental part of the Ada > front end in GCC. Actually in my message I was talking of documentation of the code rather than functional documentation, but indeed it would be good if the functional documentation were up to date. > Is there any news on what can be expected in the way of > getting the documentation corresponding with the code for 3.4.0? As you know we have been concentrating on synchronizing the code, and that seems to be in fairly good shape. Getting similar procedures in place for the documentation is certainly important and will be addressed in the future. It's a little more problematical, since the doc sets are not identical.