From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6691 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 10:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6639 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 10:36:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO develer.com) (151.38.19.110) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 10:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 28349 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 10:36:22 -0000 Received: from beetle.trilan (HELO develer.com) (?mNq3XyrGQ59DviS0c7hKv1vAvDNBHVs7?@10.3.3.220) by ns.trilan with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 10:36:21 -0000 Message-ID: <400D04A5.6050809@develer.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:36:00 -0000 From: Bernardo Innocenti Organization: Develer S.r.l. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: Matthias Klose , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Zidlicky , Gunther Nikl Subject: Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux References: <4009E670.5090600@develer.com> <16394.22429.131429.162236@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01468.txt.bz2 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Matthias Klose writes: > > >>See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-01/msg00720.html for >>the test results. > > > Could you please try to analyze the failures? That is probably > easier than tracking down the comparison failures. I think I can take the EH related ones. My guess is that we have an off-by-one bug in dw2 unwinding information generated by m68k_output_function_prologue(). I'm also aware that offsets should be computed backwards for ColdFire frames when using movem with no pre-decrement. My m68k-linux test box is currently being upgraded by the Debian people. I'll have to wait until they're done before I can start analyzying the failures. -- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/