From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20706 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2004 14:19:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20690 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 14:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 14:19:57 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD909F2F15; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05707-01-7; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from gnat.com (hoosic.gnat.com [205.232.38.102]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515ECF2F49; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:19:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4020FF45.9030103@gnat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:19:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Matz Cc: "S. Bosscher" , "'kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu '" , "'paolo.bonzini@polimi.it '" , "'gcc@gcc.gnu.org '" Subject: Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F3741E@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 It certainly seems unfortunate that tree-ssa removes a critical (well documented :-) part of gcc functionality, and this omission may well cause significant delays in bringing Ada up to tree-ssa level. Are there any other features that are being removed like this?