From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-92525-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7563 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 15:05:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7554 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2004 15:05:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout03.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.81)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2004 15:05:40 -0000
Received: from fwd07.aul.t-online.de 
	by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 1B2AhJ-0002V5-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:05:09 +0100
Received: from kolme (EB9P-gZdZe4Vo+IWgmyzE+6qtPSEdDk+61J1-nVjQiqFMU2B3LrJEg@[80.138.173.75]) by fmrl07.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 1B2AhJ-2IaPK40; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:05:09 +0100
Received: from goofy.hamnixda.de ([192.168.100.249] helo=tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de)
	by kolme with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B2AhH-0000XT-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:05:07 +0100
Message-ID: <40532322.3080600@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:05:00 -0000
From: Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040304)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
CC: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,  dnovillo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
References: <000e01c4090b$4b9f5540$5adf1d97@philo>
In-Reply-To: <000e01c4090b$4b9f5540$5adf1d97@philo>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Seen: false
X-ID: EB9P-gZdZe4Vo+IWgmyzE+6qtPSEdDk+61J1-nVjQiqFMU2B3LrJEg@t-dialin.net
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>For SPEC2000int, the branch is 2% behind mainline on x86.  For
>>SPEC2000fp, the branch is 0.4% ahead.  I will post x86-64 resuts soon.
> 
> 
> Are the performance problems on SPEC2000int (and the improvements in
> SPEC2000fp) concentrated in a single test?
> 
> 
>>Currently, bootstrap times on the branch are 14% slower than mainline
>>[...] Work is underway to remove some RTL passes

I once did experiments removing all gcse passes (-fno-gcse -fno-gcse-lm 
-fno-gcse-sm) and got no changes in resulting performance for the POOMA 
based applications.

Richard.