From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-92528-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22952 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 15:40:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22945 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2004 15:40:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout06.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.19)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2004 15:40:28 -0000
Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de 
	by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 1B2BFQ-0004An-03; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:40:24 +0100
Received: from kolme (TbMC2TZdYeiKB4Z7Sb2BN5+Gl9xfDj8WQhfwJP0Qu3SppdoHLZ5kZQ@[80.138.173.75]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 1B2BFL-0PqJyy0; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:40:19 +0100
Received: from goofy.hamnixda.de ([192.168.100.249] helo=tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de)
	by kolme with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B2BFF-0000Xt-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:40:13 +0100
Message-ID: <40532B5E.1000905@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:40:00 -0000
From: Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040304)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>, GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
References: <000e01c4090b$4b9f5540$5adf1d97@philo>	 <40532322.3080600@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <1079192233.3173.324.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1079192233.3173.324.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Seen: false
X-ID: TbMC2TZdYeiKB4Z7Sb2BN5+Gl9xfDj8WQhfwJP0Qu3SppdoHLZ5kZQ@t-dialin.net
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2

Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 10:05, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> 
>>I once did experiments removing all gcse passes (-fno-gcse -fno-gcse-lm 
>>-fno-gcse-sm) and got no changes in resulting performance for the POOMA 
>>based applications.
>>
> 
> Compile or run time performance?

Run time performance.  Compile time improved 5%.

Richard.