From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 792 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2004 00:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 783 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 00:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 00:11:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58142F55D7; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 01:11:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4054F4D9.50905@suse.de> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:11:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Robert Ladd Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! References: <4054ED19.8020009@coyotegulch.com> In-Reply-To: <4054ED19.8020009@coyotegulch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 Scott Robert Ladd wrote: > I look forward to illumination (or at least some bright ideas!) I don't have ready at hand tree-ssa but I have lno-branch and the below are my numbers (P4-2400) (-O2 -std=c99 -fomit-frame-pointer -ftree-loop-optimize -fscalar-evolutions -funroll-loops) paolo:~/Work> time a.out r = 100000000.000000 0.210u 0.000s 0:00.21 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 100pf+0w Pretty good ;) Paolo. P.S. For comparison, mainline and your exact flags give here: 14.950u 0.010s 0:15.00 99.7% 0+0k 0+0io 98pf+0w