From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9094 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2004 02:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9087 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 02:38:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ams003.ftl.affinity.com) (216.219.253.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 02:38:48 -0000 Received: from coyotegulch.com ([4.4.125.218]) by ams.ftl.affinity.com with ESMTP id <313741-29462>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:37:46 -0500 Message-ID: <405516F7.4070805@coyotegulch.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:38:00 -0000 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040310 Debian/1.6-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Berlin CC: gcc mailing list Subject: Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! References: <4054ED19.8020009@coyotegulch.com> <4054F4D9.50905@suse.de> <40550945.6020904@coyotegulch.com> <8BCCADE0-7625-11D8-AE1D-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <4055150A.8090008@coyotegulch.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 Daniel Berlin wrote: > Oh, well, that one does nothing, since the optimizations were only > implemented in the lno-branch. > :) Ah, more proof that I should never read documentation; it only confuses matters! :) -- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com) Software Invention for High-Performance Computing