From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-92591-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2608 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2004 11:31:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2597 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 11:31:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 11:31:11 -0000
Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF25E2F772E;
	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:31:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <40559426.1010101@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:31:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>,
	Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
References: <4054ED19.8020009@coyotegulch.com> <64F82240-7615-11D8-8086-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> <405592D6.3060200@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <405592D6.3060200@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2

Paolo Carlini wrote:

> In the meanwhile we have learned that the real reason why Icc performs
> better then mainline gcc is the use of an iterative SSE instruction
> (see Dan Nicolaescu message).

+ the <math.h> interesting issue, of course, but the real point of my 
message
was the other one.

Paolo.