From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-93024-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18369 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 02:04:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18284 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 02:04:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO proradius03) (208.54.142.1)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 02:04:58 -0000
Received: from codesourcery.com ([10.253.176.27])
	by proradius03 (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2J1nxS04732;
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <405A554E.1040205@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:42:00 -0000
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
References: <200403091809.i29I9P04020607@sirius.codesourcery.com> <200403190031.22113.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <405A3F26.2050100@codesourcery.com> <200403190155.18981.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200403190155.18981.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01105.txt.bz2

Eric Botcazou wrote:

>>I'm OK with the blockage approach.  We can try to do better for 3.4.1,
>>perhaps.
>>    
>>
>
>And what about Jakub's tweak?
>  
>
Oh, sorry, yes; I meant to include that.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com