From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16711 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2004 15:46:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16704 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2004 15:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2004 15:46:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB24339687; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:46:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <405DB900.4060809@suse.de> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:02:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: Scott Robert Ladd , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: 128-bit long long? References: <405DB46B.80208@coyotegulch.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01247.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger wrote: >That will break too many "portable" software ;-(. > > Thanks. In this respect C99 seems much better than current C++. However: http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1568.htm :) Paolo.