public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "R. D. Flowers" <rd@chatta.us>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: jFP religious wars
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <405E5198.4020009@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878yhtkis8.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

Zack Weinberg wrote:
> "R. D. Flowers" <rd@chatta.us> writes:
> 
> 
>>would not some flag like -fp-pedantic (or however to fit in the
>>namespace) be a good idea (for both decent sets of folks: the
>>fast-and-a-little-dirty and the clean-and-a-little-slow people)?
> 
> 
> Maybe.  What would it do?

I don't think this would work. There is nothing "pedantic" in
the carefully formulated rules that make it easier/possible
to write accurate floating-point code. It is far better to
have the existing flags for -ffast-math etc, which clearly
warn that the resulting semantics may be unreliable.

The use of -pedantic to cover little used language features
or rules is one thing, the use of a flag like this to give
incorrect semantics.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-22  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1079845736.15963.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org>
2004-03-22  2:08 ` gcc Digest 21 Mar 2004 05:08:56 -0000 Issue 3435 R. D. Flowers
2004-03-22  2:39 ` jFP religious wars R. D. Flowers
2004-03-22  3:35   ` Zack Weinberg
2004-03-22  4:00     ` R. D. Flowers
2004-03-22  8:06       ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-22  8:03     ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2004-03-22 11:37       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-22 12:45         ` R. D. Flowers
2004-03-22 13:25           ` Robert Dewar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=405E5198.4020009@gnat.com \
    --to=dewar@gnat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rd@chatta.us \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).