From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-93290-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13619 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 21:41:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13603 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2004 21:41:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 21:41:29 -0000
Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B1A355D0D;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:40:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4060AEFE.3060603@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 05:57:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard.Kreckel@ginac.de
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 128-bit long long?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0403232222410.27895-100000@higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0403232222410.27895-100000@higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01371.txt.bz2

Richard B. Kreckel wrote:

>Hmmm, I've always believed that the next sentence ("However, if an
>implementation provides integer types with widths of 8, 16, 32 or 64 bits,
>it shall define the corresponding typedef names") is to be construed as a
>*requirement* of these types on machines where they make sense.
>
I agree.

Paolo.